|
Please see our Home Page for the latest information
From: Dr Michael Howitt
Wilson
15th February 2002
The Trust: The Age of Consent. Channel 4. Thursday 14th February
2002 at 9pm
This programme, whatever its intention, effectively demonstrated
the absurdity and immorality of adhering to guidelines on withholding
and withdrawing treatment, food and fluids and on cardiopulmonary
resuscitation.
Critical decisions discussed were: whether the patient should
live or die, whether the patient should be kept alive, whether
or not to feed the patient and whether or not to continue fluids
without which the patient would die.
It is not within the doctor's or anyone else's power to decide
whether a patient should live or die. Should the patient be kept
alive? It is surely incumbent upon everyone, especially doctors
to take all ordinary measures to keep a person alive. To feed
the hungry is a duty for all. How much more if they are directly
dependent on you. Whether to continue fluids without which the
patient would die, begs the question. To deliberately cause the
death of the innocent is against all codes of ethics and in particular
a doctor's ethics, although the Department of Health seems unsure
about this. It is a fearsome health service, which encourages
death and ignores human rights.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is an emergency action when
the cause of sudden cessation of respiration and/or heartbeat
is thought to be remediable. It should never be a routine treatment
and can never be planned in advance. It is a very undignified
and intrusive procedure to perform on a dying patient when there
is little or no chance of success. Guidelines have been written
back to front. They should indicate when to resuscitate, not
when to decide in advance that it should not be attempted. It
is a procedure, which is carried out far too often, but as with
any form of treatment, to write on the notes that it is out of
the question suggests to the patient and the staff that you have
given up on him/her and he/she can be neglected.
No wonder patients and relatives expressed surprise that CPR
decisions were being discussed and asked, "Are you expecting
a cardiac arrest?" No wonder the nurse seemed unhappy to
be watching Joseph dying of lack of fluids for ten days, yet
still alive. Could she not at least have cleaned and moistened
his mouth for him?
It is frequently asked, "What is wrong with our Health
Service?" Well, would you trust this Trust?
|